Best and Worst States for Child Homelessness: Is the data believable?
A "study" from the National Center of Family Homelessness was released this week and garnered national press. It reported that 1 out of every 50 children were homeless during the "study" period of 2005-2006. In addition it was reported over 1,500,000 children were homeless during the "study" period. The "study" also ranked the Best and Worst States.
We view the "data" as suspect and exaggerative.
The "study" defines homelessness in such a way that many quality families and successful parents' children were determined to be homeless in 2005-2006. Let's start with a few key parts of the definition of homelessness from the "study."
Your children would be determined to be homeless if for just one day during the "study" period they were:
"• Sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason (sometimes referred to as doubled-up);
• Living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to lack of alternative accommodations;"
Source: The National Center of Family Homelessness
Let's look at the example of an executive who gets a new job and sells his home in the state he used to work. If the family lives in an extended stay hotel in their new state while waiting to close on their new home, the children are determined to be homeless. Suspect data to me.
In addition, if a young couple lives with in-laws, which is highly common, the children can be determined to be homeless.
If your family lives in a trailer park, the children can be considered homeless according to the definition.
Of the 1,500,000 children that were determined "homeless" by the "study" here is the breakdown:
Doubled-Up (56%)
Shelters (24%)
Unknown/Other (10%)
Hotels/Motels (7%)
Unsheltered (3%)
Source: The National Center of Family Homelessness
63% of "homeless" children are either staying with other families or living in hotels! Only 37% are in the other classifications. I would like to thank Tom Palmer for breaking this story. He makes some additional great points on his blog. www.tomgpalmer.com
The Worst State for Child Homelessness from the "study" is Texas. The Best State is Connecticut.
The state rankings follow. Read them with caution.
Blog Search Engine
We view the "data" as suspect and exaggerative.
The "study" defines homelessness in such a way that many quality families and successful parents' children were determined to be homeless in 2005-2006. Let's start with a few key parts of the definition of homelessness from the "study."
Your children would be determined to be homeless if for just one day during the "study" period they were:
"• Sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason (sometimes referred to as doubled-up);
• Living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to lack of alternative accommodations;"
Source: The National Center of Family Homelessness
Let's look at the example of an executive who gets a new job and sells his home in the state he used to work. If the family lives in an extended stay hotel in their new state while waiting to close on their new home, the children are determined to be homeless. Suspect data to me.
In addition, if a young couple lives with in-laws, which is highly common, the children can be determined to be homeless.
If your family lives in a trailer park, the children can be considered homeless according to the definition.
Of the 1,500,000 children that were determined "homeless" by the "study" here is the breakdown:
Doubled-Up (56%)
Shelters (24%)
Unknown/Other (10%)
Hotels/Motels (7%)
Unsheltered (3%)
Source: The National Center of Family Homelessness
63% of "homeless" children are either staying with other families or living in hotels! Only 37% are in the other classifications. I would like to thank Tom Palmer for breaking this story. He makes some additional great points on his blog. www.tomgpalmer.com
The Worst State for Child Homelessness from the "study" is Texas. The Best State is Connecticut.
The state rankings follow. Read them with caution.
| 1 | Connecticut | |
| 2 | New Hampshire | |
| 3 | Hawaii | |
| 4 | Rhode Island | |
| 5 | North Dakota | |
| 6 | Minnesota | |
| 7 | Wisconsin | |
| 8 | Massachusetts | |
| 9 | Maine | |
| 10 | Vermont | |
| 11 | Iowa | |
| 12 | South Dakota | |
| 13 | Illinois | |
| 14 | Pennsylvania | |
| 15 | West Virginia | |
| 16 | New Jersey | |
| 17 | Virginia | |
| 18 | Maryland | |
| 19 | Delaware | |
| 20 | Ohio | |
| 21 | Wyoming | |
| 22 | Alaska | |
| 23 | Idaho | |
| 24 | Tennessee | |
| 25 | Washington | |
| 26 | Oregon | |
| 27 | Missouri | |
| 28 | Kansas | |
| 29 | Michigan | |
| 30 | Indiana | |
| 31 | Oklahoma | |
| 32 | Alabama | |
| 33 | Montana | |
| 34 | Nebraska | |
| 35 | Colorado | |
| 36 | Arizona | |
| 37 | Utah | |
| 38 | New York | |
| 39 | South Carolina | |
| 40 | California | |
| 41 | Mississippi | |
| 42 | Kentucky | |
| 43 | Florida | |
| 44 | North Carolina | |
| 45 | Nevada | |
| 46 | Louisiana | |
| 47 | New Mexico | |
| 48 | Arkansas | |
| 49 | Georgia | |
| 50 | Texas |

Comments